Blog

Dining and Dwelling part 2

Part two of Dining and Dwelling publication (Part one here)

THE GREAT MYSTERY OF PREHISTORIC BREWING.

In prehistoric times until the late Iron Age, metallurgy was limited to small hand tools and high-status items. Throughout prehistoric Europe one of the main challenges for the brewer (in the absence of suitable metal containers) was heating large volumes of water to make a wort (see below). Indeed, given that brewing until the modern era was a home-based industry, sufficiently large metal mash tuns (watertight containers) were uneconomical. So how could people brew without the application of direct heat? Hot rocks are the most logical means.

A simple web search gave us some quick answers. Today the only commercial hot-rock brewery in the world (as far as we know) is Boscos Brewery in Nashville. Here the master brewer uses Colorado Pink Granite to heat the mash. The stones are heated in a brick oven and added to the mash – in a process known as decoction, whereby the temperature is gradually raised over a period of time. Further evidence of hot rock brewing comes from Finland where Sahti, a vernacular unhopped ale is still served at rural feasts. Again the ale is prepared by immersing hot rocks into a wooden mash tun; the resulting wort is then flavoured by filtering it through juniper branches. The brewing of Sahti has been traced back over 500 years. Although Sahti is specifically linked to Finland, ales using similar brewing methods were brewed throughout the Baltic States and as far south as Ossetia in modern Georgia.

brewmasterc (1)

Boscos Head Brewer and Founding Partner Chuck Skypeck brews Stone Beer

With so many comparative ancient and contemporary processes involving pits in the ground or wooden troughs and hot-rock brewing technology, the not unreasonable conclusion we reached was that fulachta fiadh would make ideal micro-breweries.

SO HOW DO YOU BREW A PREHISTORIC BEER?

Beer at its simplest requires the following ingredients : milled, malted grain (preferably barley but wheat will do), copious amounts of reasonably clean water, yeast to aid fermentation and herbal flavouring. The latter ingredient is not an essential component in brewing but traditionally bitter tasting, dried leaves were added to counter the sweetness of the brew and increase palatability. At the processing stage the conditions and equipment required are a preparation area for malting (an aired, indoor floor space where the saturated grain can be dried and lightly roasted), firewood for heating stones, a large, watertight wooden container or mash tun, a paddle for stirring and some earthenware fermentation vessels.

the tools

The fundamentals of brewing necessitate converting the starch in the malted grains into soluble sugars. This is achieved by adding the milled, malted grain into a container of hot water heated to a temperature of approximately 67°C. This mix is then mashed or agitated using a paddle producing a glucose-rich syrupy solution known as a wort. The wort is then transferred into storage vessels where the yeast and flavourings are added and allowed to stand for several days where fermentation will naturally occur. During this stage the brew begins to fizz and froth as the active yeast devours the sugars and excretes alcohol. When the fizzing subsides the fermentation is complete and the end product is unhopped ale.

Hot-rock technology has been used by primitive communities throughout the world and involves heating fist-sized stones in a fire, removing them with a tongs or a fork and then dropping them into a water vessel. In a brewing context this process became known in Germany as ‘stein beer’ (stone beer). Indeed up until recently Rauchenfels Brewery in Marktoberdorf, Bavaria, revived this tradition by using heated Graywacke to make their own distinctive beer. This dark sandstone resists shattering under the stress of super heating and is quick to cool—ideal for brewing. A beer reviewer had this to say about their product:

‘The use of stones imparts wonderfully smoky, toffeeish notes to Steinbrau. When the hot rocks are added to the brew kettle (which is made from metal these days), some of the malt sugars will be caramelized right onto the stone surface. The stones, heated in a beechwood fire, will impart their own smokiness to the beer.’

NEXT POST: OUR BREW

Dining & Dwelling


Dining and Dwelling cover

Last year Billy and Declan gave a presentation at the National Roads Authority’s annual archaeology seminar about the fulacht beer theory. You can see a video of the presentation here. The resultant  monograph Dining and Dwelling has just been  published by the NRA and is available through bookshops or directly from Wordwell Book Sales, Wordwell Limited, Media House, South County Business Park, Leopardstown, Dublin 18 (tel: +353 1 2947860; email: helen@wordwellbooks.com).

The publishers have kindly permited us to republish our piece here. We’ll post it in parts over the coming week or so as it’s quite big. For those who’ve been reading about the beer there’s some stuff you’ve already heard about but we have added a lot more background and detail. So here’s part one:

FULACHTA FIADH AND THE BEER EXPERIMENT

Billy Quinnand Declan Moore

Fulachta fiadh, or burnt mounds, generally date from the Bronze Age and are one of the most widespread of Irish field monuments, perhaps numbering up to 5,000. Of the 500 or so sites currently entered in the NRA Archaeological Database (http://www.nra.ie/Archaeology/NRAArchaeologicalDatabase/ last accessed 20 August 2008), 28% are fulachta fiadh (with associated features) or burnt mounds/spreads (no associated features). To date, they have been excavated on road schemes in 18 counties, in all provinces. Typically, a fulacht fiadh site is defined by a low, horseshoe-shaped mound. Upon excavation the mound consists of charcoal-enriched soil and heat-shattered stone around a central trough.

The name derives from Geoffrey Keating’s 17th-century manuscript Foras Feasa ar Éirinn and as a complete term does not appear in any early manuscripts (Ó Néill, 2004). Conventional wisdom, based largely on Professor M J O’Kelly’s 1952 experiments in Ballyvourney, Co. Cork, suggests that they were used for cooking (ibid.; O’Kelly 1954). Alternative theories that have been proposed include bathing, dyeing, fulling and tanning. It is, however, generally agreed that their primary function was to heat water by depositing fired stones into a water-filled trough. In this paper we would like to explore a further hypothesis, reported previously elsewhere (Quinn & Moore 2007); namely, were some fulachta fiadh prehistoric micro-breweries?

SO WHERE DOES BEER COME INTO IT?

In order to answer this we have to look into the natural history and archaeology of intoxication. The inebriation of animals has been documented anecdotally (Dudley 2004), but has received little scientific attention. There is evidence from around the world of animals experiencing drunkenness as a result of consuming overripe fruit containing yeast (producing ethanol) resulting, unsurprisingly, in inebriation.

Indeed, what may have been drunken behaviour by Howler Monkey’s in Panama’s Barro Colorado Island was observed by Dustin Stephens, leading Stephens and Robert Dudley of the University of California, Berkeley, to the preliminary conclusion that ‘preference for and excessive consumption of alcohol by modern humans might accordingly result from pre-existing sensory biases associating ethanol with nutritional reward’ (Dudley & Stephens 2004, 318). Put simply, the so-called Drunken Monkey Hypothesissuggests that natural selection favoured primates with a heightened sense of smell for psychoactive ethanol, indicative of ripe fruit, who would thus have been more successful in obtaining nutritious fruit!

Early hunter-gatherers had an intimate knowledge of the environment around them and the effects of naturally occurring intoxicants, but the discovery of fermentation may simply have been a happy accident involving overripe fruit. However, as agriculture took root, barley and wheat became plentiful, which in turn provided good substrates for beer or ale.

There’s no argument that people were drinking beer throughout the world in prehistory. As Pete Brown says in Man Walks into a Pub (2003), ‘even elephants eat fermenting berries deliberately to get p*****d and we are much more cleverer than them [sic]’.

Recent chemical analyses of residues in pottery jars from a Neolithic village in Northern China revealed evidence of a mixed fermented beverage from as early as 9,000 years ago (McGovern et al, 2004). Clear chemical evidence for brewing in Sumeria at Godin Tepe (in modern day Iran) comes from fermentation vessels where there were pits in the ground noted by the excavators (Michel et al, 1992). In the Hymn to Ninkasi (Civil, 1964) by a Sumerian poet (dated1800 BC) and found written on a clay tablet is one of the most ancient recipes for brewing beer using pits in the ground:

‘You are the one who handles the dough,

[and] with a big shovel,

Mixing in a pit, the bappir with sweet aromatics’

In north-western Europe there is evidence of Neolithic brewing at Balbirnie in Scotland and at Machrie Moor, Arran where organic residue impregnated in sherds of Grooved Ware pottery were described as ‘perhaps the residues of either mead or ale’ (Hornsey,2003, 194). . Based on the highly decorated, beaker-shaped pottery vessels characteristic of the Bronze Age Beaker Culture it has even been suggested that Beaker people traded in some sort of alcoholic beverage and that the beakers may have been high-status drinking vessels.

Regarding Ireland, the first known reference to beer is in 1 AD (Griffiths 2007, 11), when Dioscorides (a Greek Medical writer) refers to ‘kourmi’ (a plain beer, probably made from barley) although Max Nelson relates this as a reference to Britain (Nelson 2005, 51, 64). Much later, Saint Patrick appears with ‘the priest Mescan . . . his friend and his brewer’. Perhaps unsurprisingly Patrick considers his friend and brewer to be ‘without evil’ (Annal M448.2).

As Zythophile points out in his post ‘St. Brigid and the Bathwater’ in the blog ‘Zythophile’, ale was an important part of Irish society. He notes that the Crith-Gablach (a 7th Century legal poem), for example, declared that the ‘seven occupations in the law of a king’ were:

‘Sunday, at ale drinking, for he is not a lawful flaith [lord] who does not distribute ale every Sunday; Monday, at legislation, for the government of the tribe; Tuesday, at fidchell [a popular early medieval board game]; Wednesday, seeing greyhounds coursing; Thursday, at the pleasures of love; Friday, at horse-racing; Saturday, at judgment.’

Sundays and Tuesdays must have been particularly taxing.

The following jumped out and we were surprised we hadn’t noticed it:

‘A record of a fire at the monastry of Clonard … around AD787 speaks of grain stored in ballenio, literally ‘in a bath’, which seems to mean the grain being soaked as part of the initial processes of malting.’

Zythophile suggests that what St Brigid drew off may have been water from the ballenium where the grain was steeping in the first stage of malt-making.

NEXT POST: THE GREAT MYSTERY OF PREHISTORIC BREWING

Comments on the beer at YouTube

To date there have been 10, 650 views of the fulacht video on YouTube (produced by BigYes). Later this week we’ll be attending the launch of ‘Dining and Dwelling’ – the 6th monograph in the NRA monograph series, which will see the formal publication of our beer theory. Here’s a flavour of the comments from YouTube. You can view the video on our YouTube channel at this link:

elpoulpo (2 years ago)

Awesome video ! My brewmate and I constantly argue about technical details for the best pico-brewing design and then THIS ! The beauty of the simplicity. Thanks a million!

BeeRich33 (2 years ago)

Measure your starting gravity and terminal gravity, you can find out what ABV you achieved.

MadLuplin (1 year ago)

When did you add the bog myrtle and other herbs?

moorearchaeology (1 year ago)

We added the yeast after cooling the wort in a bath for 3/4 hours and then, three days later, when the yeast had taken, we added the herbal ingredients by suspending the ground herbs in a muslin bag in the fermenting vessel – after three – four days it was all ready. You can read more on the moore group blog!

Headwave (1 year ago)

Lads that’s only magic and 99% right! I reserve the other 1% for all the other uses they have; Wool & Linen dying, Leather Production, and tentatively, Bathing, Sauna, Sweat lodge, evaporation of herbs for Medicinal cures and washing the dog. Great film and thank the ancestors for experimental archaeology and people with the Ale gene.

chilcox (1 year ago)

Amazing video. Brewing beer can be a bit intimidating with all the “specific gravity” and “infusion mashing” talk. Jeez Louise, just make beer for Pete’s sake. It doesn’t have to be all that complicated. I like the fact that you weren’t at all concerned about “pH levels” or the “final gravity” or any of that esoteric nonsense. It tastes different every time…and you’re okay with that. Anyway, I really enjoyed it….same goes for the Moore Group website, lots of good info. Thanks for posting.

grofaz1939 (1 year ago)

F—in’ Magic and dead right on!

AllanCav (1 year ago)

Ha ha legends! I love the slurry arkeeollologicalal essplanashun at the end.

oxman0313 (9 months ago)

I would say that you are dead on. I think the irish made beer before anything. Go Beer.

jahfish42 (8 months ago)

Nice idea! But from all the excavated troughs, have we ever had grain in any quantity? Surely it would be spilt everywhere?

mooregroupgalway (8 months ago)

Have a look at our blog at wordpress – google moore groups blog – We’ve been asked this question before – click on the beer category – and you’ll find loads of info on it – anecdotally we’ve heard that even on sites where you would expect a great deal of grain residue there’s none.

jahfish42 (8 months ago)

Reply

now mead or something similar – now you’re talking – this mght leave no obvious residue. But then why the need for the trough…..

fjorukrain04 (6 months ago)Reply

it you used a trough buried in the ground it would keep the temperature more stable, it would also be at a better height for working. plus it you made legs for the hrough there is a chance of it tipping over, and in my mind there are very few things worse then spilling that much good beer

gargoylesama (7 hours ago)

The spent grain could have easily been fed to livestock. The local craft brewery here has a farmer that comes by and picks up the spent grain for his cows. Waste not want not was more than an idea in earlier periods. Sometimes it was a matter of survival.

juamei (8 months ago)

Reply

Beer done easy!
Where would the Bronze Age folk get the natural yeast from?

mooregroupgalway (8 months ago)

@juamei – Again, have a read of the blog for more info on the process – Yeast exists in the air – it’s entirely plausible that natural air-borne yeast can infect your wort. The first brew we did, we left the remains of the wort in the pit overnight and by the following day air-borne yeast was already acting on it. Yeast is everywhere, the secret of a good beer is finding the right one and ensuring consistency over time – google Belgian Lambic beer for a modern example.

gargoylesama (7 hours ago)

It is also known that they would use risen bread dough as a starter of sorts. Ale yeast and bread yeast are of the same genus and species, so it is not a far stretch

jstema (3 months ago)

mmmmmmmbeer

theplainsman6 (2 months ago)

“Give us the flaw”

What? Flaw? Beer and meat cooked on a stick? Flaw? What?

Sounds like a fucking barbeque to me.

My Summer Holidays by Billy Quinn aged 41 and a half.

Following a recent excursion to Belgium to investigate German trench positions in the vicinity of the the village of Messines, Declan asked if I would post an entry describing my experiences …here it is.

The excavations were directed by Martin Brown and Richard Osgood, two archaeologists working with the Defence estates in England. Both are involved with No Man’s Land – a European Group for Great War Archaeology that has been working on a seasonal basis in the area of Ploegstreet (Conmines and –Warneton), Belgium. They and their team of specialists, conservators, archaeologists and volunteers have been forensically investigating WW1 positions for the past number of years and have recently published a book “Digging Up Plugstreet” recording their findings. Youo can find lots more details on their blog here.

Work this year was concentrated on excavating a number of trenches in the vicinity of the Ultimo crater, the result of one of 19 mines that exploded beneath the German lines between 0300 and 0335 in the early morning of June 7th 1917. It is thought the mines killed in excess of 10,000 Germans and the sound of the successive detonations was heard as far away as London and Dublin. The explosions coincided with the front line troops being relieved so the large number of casualties can be accounted for by both sets of soldiers being caught up in the blast. Of the dead who were not immediately obliterated many were found with no evidence of direct trauma injuries, they were simply killed by the intensity of shock wave.

Following the explosions, the allies advanced on the Messines salient from three sides and secured their first objectives within hours. In the bloody litany of allied offensive failures the battle of Messines was a total success aided by the shock and devastation of the mines, a creeping artillery barrage, and a rapid ANZAC led advance.

To famously quote General Plumer on the night before the attack, “Gentlemen, we may not make history tomorrow, but we shall certainly change the geography.” And change it they did – today the ultimo crater is approximately 70ft wide and occupies a low ridge surrounded by a small copse of trees. It is now home to ducks and wading birds, its present pastoral setting at complete odds with its violent origins.

The excavation team was quartered in the Messines Peace Village hostel for the week and our working day began at 8.30am. Work officially finished at 5.30 but such was the crew’s enthusiasm that we rarely left the site earlier than 6pm. I’m glad to report that throughout the week we enjoyed excellent weather.

A total of 6 trenches were exposed, all with particular research objectives informed by previous excavations or more recent geophysical results. I, along with a team of 5 others under the supervision of the capable Avril, was despatched to dig a communications trench that zigzagged from a rear position to the front line. What struck me most was the extent of the upcast from the explosion. Thousands of tonnes of earth erupted into the air and the resulting infill preserved much of what wasn’t destroyed in the initial blast. Equally interesting was the sheer frequency of ferric litter. Iron fragments, shrapnel balls, driving bands from shells etc were evident in every shovel full. We found Mauser rounds spent and unspent, German stick grenades, and occasional Lee Enfield casings.  As we dug down we exposed the cut of the German communication trench, defined not by any revetment but silt from puddling at the base as well as post holes and the faint ghost marks of duckboards. Running along the edge of the trench we also found communication cables and the possible remains of an electrical junction box. Elsewhere other trenches exposed fire trenches with heavy corrugate, a German concrete bunker, and a midden with some truly remarkable finds (I’m not going to steal the excavators thunder in describing them, but you can check out the Plugstreet blog for more details).

All in all the excavation produced a wealth of material and adds to the existing military narrative of the period. On a personal note I want to thank all of those involved for the kindness and friendliness I experienced in the nightly gatherings over a few beers in the peace park; and particularly to Martin and Richard who ran the project with such a light touch belying their thoroughly professional manner.

Moore on Beer

Okay: It’s not exactly TED. But anyway, here’s our (Billy & Dec’s) presentation at the 2008 NRA Seminar (Dining and Dwelling) which is due for publication next month.

Entitled: ‘Fulachta fiadh and the beer experiment: suggested future research strategies.’ Any Chinese viewers, please forgive Declan. Also note Erratum: Dr. Patrick McGovern, sometimes referred to as the Indiana Jones of beer, was until recently employed at the University of Pennsylvania Museum and not Minneapolis as Declan erroneously states.

Video courtesy NRA.