Blog

Cahercommaun Fort, Co. Clare

We selected Cahercommaun Fort for WhenonGE 80 which was identified by Brian Dolan at Seandálaiocht. So here’s a little more info on the site. The fort is well known and is an inland cliff-top fort in state ownership. It comprises a roughly circular stone enclosure perched on a cliff edge with two concentric outer enclosing walls. A well-defined passageway gives access through the outer enclosure to the centre enclosure on the eastern side of the fort and traces of radial walls and other ephemeral features can be seen between the enclosing walls and in the surrounding fields.

Cahercommaun is situated in the Burren region of County Clare. The distinctive Karst geology here consists of great expanses of bare rock and relatively smooth slopes which are the result of intense erosion of loose rocks and other debris by glacial ice which crossed Galway Bay and then over-rode the Burren plateau. Parallel to the direction of ice movement, the effects of glacial erosion have emphasised pre-existing landforms such as the cliffs, cols and terraces that characterise the immediate area surrounding Cahercommaun fort.

When on Google Earth 80

Cahercommaun from Google Earth

The Burren is well known for its Karst scenery and unusual flora and has long been a place of pilgrimage for naturalists. Pollen analyses have shown that there was a complete cover of pine with subsidiary hazel and yew on the Burren during the Boreal and Atlantic periods. Today woodland is rare but patches of hazel are fairly widespread. The numerous parallel fissures dissecting the soil-free limestone pavement harbour an abundant and diverse flora consisting mostly of fragmentary patches of limestone grassland or a woodland ground flora.

Cahercommaun is sited at the north western edge of the extensive plateau of Tullycommon/Glaseivagh Hill, an area providing the best winter grazing for cattle in the whole of the Burren. In the immediate vicinity of the fort, the narrow side of the plateau drops steeply to a narrow gorge about 30m below. The stone fort of Caislean Gearr (SMR CL010:057) stands on a rock pinnacle at the entrance to this gorge. The Plateau itself is dotted with archaeological sites, over twenty cashels or enclosures have been recorded, as well as four wedge tombs, a cist grave and a number of prominently sited cairns.

Cahercommaun

Cahercommaun fort (Cathair Chommáin or Chumainn) is situated in Tullycommon townland (Tulach Chommáin orChumainn). According to Edel Bhreathnach both placenames may retain in their second element the personal names Commáin or Cumann (Bhreathnach, 1999, 90). They can thus be translated as the fort of Commáin or Cumann and the hill of Commáin or Cumann.

“It is plausible to suggest, however, given what is known of the polity of this region from the 7th century onwards that the fort was constructed either by a branch of the Ciarriage, to whom Cumann mac Dega belonged, or more probably by the Uí Chormaic, the segment of the Uí Fidgeinti to whom Commán mac Mainich was affiliated. The Uí Fidigeinti case is stronger, considering that their authority from the Shannon Estuary to the Aran Islands in the 7th and 8th centuries was solid enough to cause the construction of a fort of the dimensions of Cahercommaun”.

Moore Group undertook a project at Cahercommaun on behalf of the Department in 2003. The project involved the removal by hand of stone collapse lying south of the outer enclosure wall to enable repair works to be carried out the breaches in the wall in advance of construction of a proposed boardwalk.

Access to the site is granted by a well defined track from the road to the field boundary to the east of the fort.

Six cuttings concentrating on areas of rubble collapse were manually cleared of overgrowth and recorded. The stone collapse was than half sectioned, where possible, and finally removed to designated spoil areas exposing the original surface level. All the stone collapse corresponded to areas where the outer enclosure wall had been breached or degraded. No finds were retrieved from the collapse. However, a stone feature, possibly a hut site or animal pen, was exposed to the west of trench 1. This feature abutted both the outer enclosure all and an early field boundary.

Our trench 1 was located to the east of a junction point of a field boundary with the outer enclosure wall and was the westernmost of all the cuttings. The trench originally measured 11.5 m by 3 m but was later extended to the east following on-site discussions with Dr. Ann Lynch.

Possible hut site, Cahercommaun

At the western terminal of the trench a curvilinear stone feature was identified running south from the outer enclosure wall towards a field wall orientated north south. This feature consisted of a number of foundation stones set on edge and laid regularly in a row. The alignment of these stones corresponded to a large stone jutting out from the base of the outer enclosure wall. Although the investigation of the feature was limited by the constraints of the trench it was possible to follow its line as it curved to the west past a point where it abutted the field wall and back towards the outer enclosure wall where it disappeared under overgrowth and rubble collapse. The feature may well be a hut site or small animal pen similar to those found within the fort.

In the exposed cutting, the stone foundation measured 3m north south and had a width of approximately 0.32 m. internally there was a number of inset stones that may have formed a floor level. Further investigative work on the feature lay outside the scope of our archaeological brief; the exposed stones were recorded, photographed and left in situ.

Cotter, C., 1999. Western Stone Forts Project, Cahercommaun Fort, Co. Clare; a reassessment of its cultural context. In Discovery Programme Reports 5. Dublin.

When on Google Earth 80

We’ve posted a more detailed piece on Cahercommaun following it’s identification by Brian Dolan for your further reading..

As Declan solved When on Google Earth 79 (WhenonGE) at Matts WOGE, after some very significant clues, here’s WhenonGE 80…

When on Google Earth 80

When on Google Earth 80

So once again here are the rules:

Q: What is When on Google Earth? A: It’s a game for archaeologists, or anybody else willing to have a go!

Q: How do you play it? A: Simple, you try to identify the site in the picture.

Q: Who wins? A: The first person to correctly identify the site, including its major period of occupation, wins the game.

Q: What does the winner get? A: The winner gets bragging rights and the chance to host the next When on Google Earth on his/her own blog!

Be the first to correctly identify the site below and its major period of occupation in the comments below and you can host your own!

For a list of previous WhenonGE’s see the list on our blog post here and then you can follow the link in the comments to trace the sequence back to here… or join the Facebook group here….

Appropriate Assessment

The Department of Environment, Heritage & Local Government has issued recent Guidance on Appropriate Assessment,

A copy of the Guidance Document can be downloaded here.

Appropriate Assessment is defined as: ‘An assessment carried out under Article 6(3) of the Habitats Directive of the implications of a plan or project, either individually or in combination with other plans and projects, on a Natura 2000 site in view of the site’s conservation objectives’.

Article 6(3) requires that any plan or project that is not directly connected with or necessary to the management of the Natura 2000 site concerned but is likely to have a significant effect on it, on its own or in combination with other plans and projects, is to be authorised only if it will not adversely affect the integrity of that site. If screening indicates the need, Appropriate Assessment itself, must be carried out and the assessment and conclusions recorded to ensure that existing and future plans or projects are not authorised if they are likely to adversely affect the integrity of a site. These safeguards are designed to ensure the conservation of Natura 2000 sites.

In order for a Planning Authority to apply the Appropriate Assessment process it must be presented with a Statement for Appropriate Assessment which addresses the Qualifying Interests and Conservation Objectives of the Natura 2000 sites in question and how the plan may affect these objectives.

Moore Group has compiled several Appropriate Assessment Screening Documents and Statements for Appropriate Assessment.  If you have any queries on the process please feel free to contact Ger at Ger@mooregroup.ie or telephone 091-765640.

Bronze Age Halberd

Occasionally we’ve been adding to our ‘virtual museum’, with brief descriptions of the artefacts we’ve recovered over the years. Generally we’ll only post up the very special finds! One of Billy’s most notable stray finds from last year was retrieved during the course of archaeological testing near the River Corrib. The find was un-associated with any other artefacts or features and was identified as a Bronze Age Halberd. This weapon was fashionable in various parts of Europe in the third and second millennia BC. The halberd is distinguished by its pointed, dagger like metal blade that would have been mounted using rivets at right angles to a haft. Only 170 have been found in Ireland half of which are un-provenanced. This find has to be considered as very significant given its antiquity, rarity and its discovery near a known fording point over the River Corrib

In Professor E. Rynne’s ‘Military and Civilian swords from the River Corrib’ (1984) there is an inventory of finds recovered by amateur divers from the River during the period 1982-3. This inventory includes late mesolithic flint, chert Bann flakes, ten swords and a 20th century flare gun. Three swords were found in the vicinity of the area we were testing. They include a La Tene type, 2nd century AD sword found between Menlough and Newcastle, and a Viking period 10th century sword in close proximity to a late medieval 15th century sword both found near Jordans Island. Other finds recovered along this stretch of the river in the recent past include Bann flakes, hammerstones, axeheads, scrapers and chert and flint debitage. This material indicates a high degree of pre-historic activity on the Corrib particularly so in the vicinity of Jordan’s Island which was a documented fording point.

Our trench measured approximately 53m in length by 2m in width and was excavated to an average depth of 1m. The stratigraphy along the length of this trench consisted of an upper layer of tarmac and hardcore on a mixed silty deposit with frequent small to medium sized stones overlying a thick layer of peat. The peat contained some modern finds including brick and willow wear pottery sherds and fragments of ceramic pipe. During the course of the testing a metal object was retrieved at a depth of 920mm from the existing surface. The object was identified as a Bronze Age Halberd dating to the second millennium BC. This weapon would have been mounted at right angles to a haft using rivets. The blade, probably made from copper was shaped like a thorn and measured 160mm in length by 110.5mm along its butt. It had a central ridge tapering to a point along its blade and near the butt were two central placed circular perforations with evidence for three rivet holes along its back edge. A small section of the upper butt was missing. On discovery permission was sought and granted from the National Museum and the Licensing Section of the National Monuments Service to enlarge the immediate area around the find spot by a further 3m to the east and 2m to the west. Consent was also granted to metal detect the area and spoil heap for associated finds. Over the course of a two day period this area was manually investigated and metal detected resulting in the retrieval of a small rectangular band of metal from the vicinity of the find spot and the recovery of the missing piece from the butt of the halberd. The find spot was later planned and recorded. Due to the antiquity of the find and to prevent against any degradation the halberd was handed over to the National Museum for immediate conservation.

Reinventing the wheel

Paul Rondelez in Cork drew our attention to a paper from the Journal of the Royal Historical and Archaeological Association of Ireland from 1886 which spoke to us through the centuries. A kindred spirit and direct descendent of Daniel O’Connell, one Gabriel Redmond M.D., musing on the function of Fulachta Fiadh in the aforementioned paper, posited that the sites may have functioned as brewing places….

The relevant passage from page 404:
“The Irish, we know, were not good cooks… but good or bad as their cuisine may have been, they required to wash it down with liquid of some sort, and the old Irish, we are told, partook of mead or metheglin. Now it is known that they used heath as hops, and these mounds, being situated in the midst of heath, we may infer that some of them, at least, were used as brewing places, as well as cooking hearths. “
I’ve pasted the piece below.

Thanks very much to Paul for forwarding the paper to us. Just goes to show that nothing in archaeology is new!

Reference: Redmond, G., 1886. History, Antiquities, Archæological Remains, and Legends Connected with the Western End of the County Waterford, The Journal of the Royal Historical and Archaeological Association of Ireland, Fourth Series, Vol. 7, No. 65 (Jan., 1886), pp. 394-405,  Royal Society of Antiquaries of Ireland